Search Gaia Health Website
    


UK Is Testing Polypill Heart Med in a Show Trial with Plans to Give It to Everyone Over Age 50.

They Really Do Believe Health Is Found in Drugs! If you're over 50, then you are defined as sick and in need of at least four drugs. But don't fret! They're all together in a single easy-to-take pill.

by Heidi Stevenson

4 January 2011

Pills inside heart-shaped rope loop

If you're over 50 in the UK, you have been defined as sick and in need of a drugs. To this end, the polypill, which contains four drugs, is currently being tested. Within a couple of years, it's expected that people will either go to their local pharmacy and buy it off the shelf or get the pharmacist to prescribe it.

The first, and most important thing to note is that the authors of the article promoting the concept of the polypill in the British Medical Journal, NJ Wald and RW Law, just happen to have a patent application for a formulation of a polypill. (If you don't think there's any reason to read further...well, I can't argue with that.)

Here are the four drugs to be included in the polypill:

  • Simvastatin
  • Losartan
  • Hydrochlorthiazide
  • Amlodopine

They're counting on a "synergistic" effect with the combination. The test will last six months, though their goal is to have everyone taking it starting on the 50th birthday for the rest of their [foreshortened?] lives.

According to The Guardian, one of the researchers running the trial, Dr. David Wald of the Wolfson Institute, said:

The polypill has the potential to be a daily preventive method against heart attacks and strokes, just as the contraceptive pill is a daily preventive method to avoid an unwanted pregnancy. This trial is a step towards making access to the polypill a reality.

How do you like that? He compares getting pregnant with getting a heart attack!

He further stated:

By offering the polypill on the basis of age alone, prevention is greatly simplified and the population receiving the polypill are not medicalized, because they do not have to become patients to receive it.

Interesting reasoning: You aren't "medicalized" unless you go to a doctor. So, taking a daily pill that consists of four potent, not to mention dangerous, drugs isn't really taking a medicine because you didn't go into a doctor's office to get it. But it's not surprising, when you see what passes for a trial before pushing it onto the public.

The trial will include only 100 people. They will all take the polypill for 12 weeks and a placebo for 12 weeks, though they won't know which they're taking at any time. So, there's no control group. After that, they'll all be given the real polypill for two years. However, the researchers are hoping to have the pills on the market in less than two years.

The subjects' blood pressure and cholesterol will be monitored for the 24 week duration of the official trial. Obviously, all they're doing is seeing if the drugs lower blood pressure and cholesterol. It has never been proven that lowering cholesterol and blood pressure prevents heart attacks in people who've never had heart attacks—but that doesn't seem to be of any particular concern.

This brief trial of only 100 people is the basis on which they're planning to push these drugs on everyone over age 50. This doesn't even approach so-called "evidence based medicine". This is a show trial to get approval for drug marketing or convince the public that they really ought to take the product.

They must have already determined what the outcome will be. If they'd intended the trial to be a genuine test of whether the polypill works and whether it's safe, then it would have been far bigger, lasted far longer, and there would have been a genuine placebo group that received only placebo. This is a farce. They're already hoping to have it on the market in 18-24 months, before even this pathetic excuse for a trial has been completed!

It's true that much larger trials are being done elsewhere in the world, but that doesn't negate the fact that this particular trial, which cannot prove anything useful, is being done. If the other trials are good, then why do this one? And why not refer to them when pushing the polypill?


Though the doses of the medications are relatively low, that does not mean there will be no adverse effects—especially when the potential for harm in these drugs is significant. Here are nonexhausive lists of adverse effects identified by Medscape for each of these drugs:

Simvastatin Losartan Hydrochlorthiazide Amlodopine
  • Angioedema
  • Anorexia
  • Anxiety
  • Arthritis
  • Bronchitis
  • Cataracts
  • Chest Pain
  • Depression
  • Dyspepsia
  • Dyspnea
  • Erectile Dysfunction
  • Erythema Multiforme
  • Gynecomastia
  • Hepatic Failure
  • Hepatitis
  • Increased Creatine Phosphokinase
  • Libido Changes
  • Lupus-Like Syndrome
  • Memory Impairment
  • Obstructive Hyperbilirubinemia
  • Ophthalmoplegia
  • Pancreatitis
  • Paresthesia
  • Peripheral Neuropathy
  • Pruritus of Skin
  • Rhabdomyolysis
  • Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
  • Thrombocytopenic Disorder
  • Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
  • Tremors
  • Urinary Tract Infections
  • Urticaria
  • Vasculitis
  • General Weakness
  • Abdominal Pain with Cramps
  • Anaphylaxis
  • Angioedema
  • Back Pain
  • Dizziness
  • Edema
  • Fatigue
  • Headache
  • Abnormal Hepatic Function Tests
  • Drug-Induced Hepatitis
  • Dyspepsia
  • Hyperkalemia
  • Hyponatremia
  • Insomnia
  • Limb Pain
  • Malaise
  • Myalgia
  • Pharyngitis
  • Rhabdomyolysis
  • Thrombocytopenic Disorder
  • Vasculitis
  • Abnormal Sexual Function
  • Anorexia
  • Disorder of Electrolytes (fairly common)
  • Hypochloremic Alkalosis (fairly common)
  • Hypokalemia (fairly common)
  • Hyponatremia (fairly common)
  • Hyperglycemia
  • Orthostatic Hypotension
  • Acute Pancreatitis
  • Agranulocytosis
  • Allergic Reactions
  • Aplastic Anemia
  • Dizziness
  • Erythema Multiforme
  • Exfoliative Dermatitis
  • General Weakness
  • Gout
  • Headache Disorder
  • Hemolytic Anemia
  • Hepatitis
  • Hypercalcemia
  • Hypercholesterolemia
  • Hypersensitivity Angiitis
  • Hyperuricemia
  • Hypomagnesemia
  • Interstitial Nephritis
  • Leukopenia
  • Muscle Spasm
  • Obstructive Hyperbilirubinemia
  • Paresthesia
  • Purpura
  • Renal Disease
  • Sialoadenitis
  • Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Thrombocytopenic Disorder
  • Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
  • Urticaria
  • Vertigo
  • Xanthopsia
  • Abnormal Hepatic Function Tests
  • Abnormal Sexual Function
  • Allergic Reactions
  • Alopecia
  • Angina
  • Anxiety
  • Ataxia
  • Back Pain
  • Bradycardia
  • Chills
  • Conduction Disorder of the Heart
  • Depersonalization
  • Depression
  • Dyschromia
  • Dyspepsia
  • Dysuria
  • Extrasystoles
  • Hypertonia
  • Hypotension
  • Increased Appetite
  • Insomnia
  • Jaundice
  • Leukopenia
  • Memory Impairment
  • Migraine
  • Mood Changes
  • Muscle Weakness
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Nervousness
  • Nightmares
  • Orthostatic Hypotension
  • Parosmia
  • Polyuria
  • Tremors
  • Twitching
  • Urticaria
  • Visual Changes
  • Weight Gain
  • Weight Loss

These are not just mild adverse effects. Many are life threatening. Then, when you consider that some of them are cited for more than one drug, such as Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, a rare but potentially deadly condition, which is cited for both Simvastatin and Hydrochlorthiazide, does the risk double? Does anyone know? Are there new risks that result from combining four drugs? In general, the more drugs a person takes, the more likely there will be adverse effects. Why should the polypill be any different?

Does it make any sense for a healthy person to take a drug in an effort to prevent diseases, especially when the diseases are of the circulatory system and nearly all related to lifestyle and food choices?

Consider how bisphosphonates were (and still are) given on a massive basis to prevent osteoporosis. The result was that it causes the condition. Women were strongly encouraged to take hormone replacement therapy at menopause and earlier to limit their risk for cardiovascular disease. Oops! That drug regime caused far more disease than it ever prevented, and it's safe to say that many women now dead would be alive today were it not for HRT. The more we try to prevent diseases with drugs, the sicker we seem to become.

Rich May of Blue Chip Chiropractic, says, "You don't get a headache from lack of aspirin." The same is true of heart attacks. They aren't the result of a lack of drugs.

*****************************************************************************

What do you think? Click here to comment!

*****************************************************************************

Search Gaia Health:

Please, make a donation to the Stop the Traditional Herbal Medicinal Products Directive Campaign!

We have two ways to donate, Paypal and Piryx. Choose which you prefer:

PayPal

--or--

Donate Now!


For more information on the petition to save our right to health freedom,
Click Here!

Subscribe to the Gaia Health
Newsletter

Don't miss breaking Gaia Health articles.
Rest assured that your e-mail address will never be sold or shared.




Word of the Day
Match Up
Match each word in the left column with its synonym on the right. When finished, click Answer to see the results. Good luck!